Groups including Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights, UN AIDS, the World Health Organization, the UN Special Procedures, the HIV/AIDS Legal Network, PIVOT Legal Society, academics, sex worker rights organizations and many others in Canada and around the world have been strong advocates for laws, policies and programs that respect, protect and fulfil sex worker rights. Now, Amnesty International too.
The Amnesty International policy on State obligations to respect, protect and fulfil the human rights of sex workers supports the human rights of sex workers and highlights the significant number of abuses they face. Among them, heightened levels of marginalization, stigma, discrimination and violence for being seen to “transgress social or sexual norms and/or gender stereotypes on the basis of their participation in sex work.”
International human rights law guarantees every person the same rights and freedoms without distinction of any kind; yet, in many countries, sex workers are denied their most basic and fundamental rights. States have an obligation to ensure sex workers have access to proper recourse, safety and protection, and to hold perpetrators of violence against sex workers accountable.
Amnesty International’s policy recommendations are in line with international research that clearly demonstrates how the criminalization of sex work both violates the human rights of sex workers and puts their health and lives at risk.
Criminal laws force sex workers into unsafe and unprotected areas and restrict access to important safety strategies, leading to significant and profound negative consequences on the health, security, dignity and liberty of sex workers.
Criminalization can create fear of legal repercussions or harassment for carrying condoms and lubricant (which can be used as evidence of buying or selling cheap levitra medication for sexual services); reduces sex workers’ ability to negotiate safer sex with clients; affects the relationship between sex workers and health service providers (such as those providing condoms and harm reduction supplies) for fear of being identified as sex workers and police entrapment; allows for impunity of perpetrators of sexual and physical violence; and heightens the risk of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections as sex workers face substantial barriers in accessing prevention, treatment, and care services, largely because of stigma, discrimination and criminalization.
Amnesty International’s research reaffirms existing evidence that recognizes the “Nordic model” as harmful for sex workers. Without consultation from sex workers themselves, the Nordic model increases stigma and work hazards without decreasing the demand for sex work.
Despite the evidence and a Supreme Court ruling, sex work remains effectively criminalized in Canada. The 2014 Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act criminalizes the purchase of sex; communicating for the purpose of purchasing and selling sex; gaining material benefit from sex work; and advertising sexual services.
Action Canada welcomes Amnesty International’s new policy and research. Through the collaboration of allied social movements and the leadership of sex workers themselves, we can end the culture of impunity for violence against sex workers and demand that Canada observe its legal obligations to respect and protect the rights of all people – including sex workers – to live in dignity and free from violence, beginning with the repeal of the 2014 legislation
 Canadian Alliance for Sex Work Law Reform: factsheet “Why Decriminalization is Consistent with Public Health Goals” https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B3mqMOhRg5FeLWpPd21VYTlidTA&usp=sharing&tid=0B3mqMOhRg5FeNlY4ZkxFb2pLaWM
 Kim Blankenship and Stephen Koester, “Criminal Law, Policing Policy and HIV Risk in Female Street Sex Workers and Injection Drug Users” (2002) 30 Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 548, p.550; Annika Eriksson and Anna Gavanas, Prostitution in Sweden 2007 (Socialstyrelsen 2008) https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/lists/artikelkatalog/attachments/8806/2008-126-65_200812665.pdf p.48; Ulf Stridbeck (ed.), Purchasing Sexual Services in Sweden and the Netherlands: Legal Regulation and Experiences—An Abbreviated English Version. A Report by a Working Group on the legal regulation of the purchase of sexual services (Justis-og Politidepartementet, 2004) https://www.regjeringen.no/upload/kilde/jd/rap/2004/0034/ddd/pdfv/232216- purchasing_sexual_services_in_sweden_and_the_nederlands.pdf pp.13 and 19; Petra Östergren, “Sexworkers critique of Swedish Prostitution policy” (2004), https://www.petraostergren.com/pages.aspx?r_id=40716; Rosie Campbell and Merl Storr, “Challenging the Kerb Crawler Rehabilitation Programme” (2001) 67 Feminist Review 94, 102 citing Steph Wilcock, The Lifeline Sexwork Project Report: Occupational Health and Safety Issues and Drug Using Patterns of Current Sexworker: Survey Findings (Manchester: Lifeline, 1998); Pro Sentret, Året 2010 (Pro Sentret, 2011) https://prosentret.no/?wpfb_dl=438 [Accessed 20 October 2013] pp.72, 78–79
 Helsedirektoratet (Norwegian Directorate of Health), UNGASS Country Progress Report Norway: January 2008–December 2009 (Helsedirektoratet, April 2010) https://www.unaids.org/en/dataanalysis/knowyourresponse/countryprogressreports/2010countries/norway_2010_ country_progress_report_en.pdf p.36, p.95 to 102.